Table 1. Six Pairwise Comparisons.
| Comparison | Mi-Mj | Q | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| False – Felt | 0.46 | 1.65 | 0.649 |
| False – Miserable | 0.46 | 1.65 | 0.649 |
| False – Neutral | 1.25 | 4.48 | 0.010 |
| Felt – Miserable | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.000 |
| Felt – Neutral | 0.79 | 2.83 | 0.193 |
| Miserable – Neutral | 0.79 | 2.83 | 0.193 |
Notice that the only significant difference is between the False and Neutral conditions.
ANOVA tests the non-specific null hypothesis that all four populations means are equal. That is
μfalse = μfelt = μmiserable = μneutral.
This non-specific null hypothesis is sometimes called the omnibus null hypothesis. When the omnibus null hypothesis is rejected, the conclusion is that at least one population mean is different from at least one other mean. However, since the ANOVA does not reveal which means are different from which, it offers less specific information than the Tukey hsd test. The Tukey hsd is therefore preferable to ANOVA in this situation. Some textbooks introduce the Tukey test only as a follow-up to an ANOVA. However, there is no logical or statistical reason why you should not use the Tukey test even if you do not compute an ANOVA.
You might be wondering why you should learn about ANOVA when the Tukey test is better. One reason is that there are complex types of analyses that can be done with ANOVA and not with the Tukey test. A second is that ANOVA is by far the most commonly-used technique for comparing means, and it is important to understand ANOVA in order to understand research reports.