
Table 1. Measures of central tendency for the test scores.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Mode Median Geometric Mean Trimean Mean trimmed 50% Mean |
84.00 90.00 89.70 90.25 89.81 91.58 |
The distribution of baseball salaries (in 1994) shown in Figure 2 has a much more pronounced skew than the distribution in Figure 1.

Figure 2. A distribution with a very large positive skew. This histogram shows the salaries of major league baseball players (in thousands of dollars).
Table 2 shows the measures of central tendency for these data. The large skew results in very different values for these measures. No single measure of central tendency is sufficient for data such as these. If you were asked the very general question: “So, what do baseball players make?” and answered with the mean of $1,183,000, you would have not told the whole story since only about one third of baseball players make that much. If you answered with the mode of $250,000 or the median of $500,000, you would not be giving any indication that some players make many millions of dollars. Fortunately, there is no need to summarize a distribution with a single number. When the various measures differ, our opinion is that you should report the mean, median, and either the trimean or a the mean trimmed 50%. Sometimes it is worth reporting the mode as well. In the media, the median is usually reported to summarize the center of skewed distributions. You will hear about median salaries and median prices of houses sold, etc. This is better than reporting only the mean, but it would be informative to hear more statistics.
Table 2. Measures of central tendency for baseball salaries (in thousands of dollars).
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Mode Median Geometric Mean Trimean Mean trimmed 50% Mean |
250 500 555 792 619 1,183 |